Research Summary
2003-2006
1 Methodologies and Data
Sound Circuit began working with contemporary music promoters in 2002. Early in the consortium’s life, it carried out an audit of existing marketing practice and access to marketing information. This found that promoters had a lack of research information about their own markets and a shared need to understand their markets better and define priority target audiences more effectively.
Key areas about which promoters needed information included
- The profile of existing audiences
- Potential for cross-over with other artform audiences
- Potential for collaborative audience development amongst contemporary music promoters
Sound Circuit started a programme of research in 2003, using 3 principal methodologies: audience questionnaire work; box office data analysis; and action research projects.
- The audience questionnaire research was done through surveying audiences for 4 tours between 2003, and 2005. This involved 9 different venues, and 586 respondents.
- The box office data analysis was done in 2005, and looked at contemporary music audiences for the previous 3 years. For this element of the research Sound Circuit joined with the Contemporary Music Network, and included their audiences as well. The box office research in total took in 405 contemporary music events at 15 different venues, for which there were found to be a total of 23,925 unique bookers.
- The action research projects have involved individual promoters testing out audience development strategies, evaluating their impact, and then sharing their results and findings with the rest of the consortium. Different action research projects were carried out by promoters in Birmingham, Oxford, Manchester, York, Huddersfield and London.
1.1 Box Office Data Overview
The Sound Circuit promoters who contributed data were: York University, Huddersfield Contemporary Music Festival, Royal Northern College of Music, Birmingham Contemporary Music Group, Oxford Contemporary Music, London Sinfonietta, South Bank Centre and Brighton Dome and Corn Exchange. CMN tour venues which also contributed data were located in Liverpool, Manchester, Leeds, Huddersfield, Birmingham, Coventry, Bracknell, London, Basingstoke, Brighton, Southampton and Exeter, and they represented 6 CMN tours.
The research looked at the data from these different locations in several ways –a set of data was defined for each promoter so that they could compare their individual findings with those of other promoters; an overall set for CMN in all its locations was identified; and an aggregated set for all Sound Circuit promoters was also defined. (This set excluded the South Bank because their quantity of data would have dominated the sample, and also to avoid a London bias in the findings.)
The overall sample of data, contained around 24,000 bookers. The total number of tickets bought by this sample over the 3 years studied was 82,888, and the total value of those tickets was £883,681. The average spend per booker over the period was £33.43.2 Key Findings
2.1 Geographic Location of Bookers
One of the aspects of the market promoters were interested in investigating was the geographic spread of bookers – where they were coming from in relation to the venue. This was answered by calculating the distance from the booker’s home to the venue using postcode data, and expressing the results at drive distances. It was found that the pattern was in fact similar for most promoters.
A large proportion, close to half of bookers (46%) came from within 5 miles of the venue. A little further out, it was found that just 16% of bookers came from between 5 and 10 miles drive distance, and 13% came from between 10 and 20 miles. The final group, the proportion from over 20 miles, was 25%.
Comparing the Sound Circuit results with other research provides the following figures:
Sound Circuit CMN 2005 |
Arts Index Classical 2002 |
ACE WM Festivals 2005 |
|
10 miles or less |
62% |
54% |
57% |
10 to 20 miles |
13% |
23% |
18% |
over 20 miles |
25% |
22% |
25% |
[Sound Circuit + CMN base: 295 events, 9,050 bookers / Arts Index 2002 – Arts Council England, base: 318 events, 22,297 bookers / ACE WM Festivals research 2005, base: 15 festivals, 12,772 bookers]
The figures are fairly consistent. It seems that contemporary music is attracting the same proportion of visitors (from over 20 miles) as other artforms, and this provides some useful evidence for its value in cultural tourism development, and consideration of economic impact. However, contemporary promoters may be falling behind with attracting a regional audience – those from between 10 and 20 miles away, or indeed between just 5 and 20 miles away.
2.2 Frequency of Attendance
Looking at the situation for bookers and promoters overall, 72% of bookers had booked just once during the 3 years included in the study. Those people who came just once accounted for 29% of bookings over 3 years. The next group (16% of bookers) came either 2 or 3 times each over 3 years. Their business made up 15% of bookings overall. The final group, making up 12% of bookers, had booked for 4 or more events over the 3 years (and in fact many of them had booked for many more than this), and they accounted for 56% of bookings overall.
There are 2 striking issues here: One is that over half of bookings, 56%, came from just 12% of the customer base, and secondly, it’s staggering that 72% of the customer base had booked once during the 3 years and not been heard from again.
Existing data about frequency indicates that this figure is not unusual. Arts About Manchester found in their DataCulture:Vital Statistics programme that 80% of the existing audience for the performing arts in Greater Manchester only book once a year, and other arts studies have put the figure at 69%.
This raises the question of whether contemporary music promoters are actually much better at attracting new attenders than they thought, and have as a result neglected to develop effective customer retention strategies to hold onto their hard-won new attenders. Considering that the marketing cost of acquiring a new customer is believed in the commercial sector to be 5 times the cost of retaining an existing customer, finding an appropriate balance between resources spent on attracting new audiences, and resources invested in developing the existing customer base, will be one of the keys to building attendance overall.
2.3 Attendance at Other Artforms
The audience survey asked what other types of events attenders had been to in the past 12 months: 84% had also been to classical music, 79% had also been to art galleries/ exhibition, 76% had also been to the cinema, 77% had also been to plays, and 63% had also been to opera. These attending habits were compared to those of people at orchestral concerts and using results from a Matthews Millman evaluation study of Classic FM support for orchestral concerts, which looked at attenders of standard orchestral concerts as well as concerts supported by Classic FM. This study found that 73% of orchestral attenders had also been to art galleries or exhibitions in the previous 12 months, 68% had also been to the cinema, 63% had also been to plays, and 51% had also been to opera.
Sound Circuit Attenders 2005 |
Orchestral Attenders 2004 (Matthews Millman) |
|
Classical Music |
84% |
|
Visual Arts |
79% |
73% |
Cinema |
77% |
68% |
Plays |
77% |
63% |
Opera |
61% |
51% |
[Sound Circuit base: 22 events, 688 respondents / Matthews Millman – An evaluation of Classic FM support for orchestral concerts (results for non-supported and supported concerts)]
The conclusion here seems to be that contemporary attenders are also visiting the same broad art forms as orchestral attenders, but are doing so in higher proportions.
2.4 Motivation for Attendance
The survey also asked what had made people want to attend the contemporary music event where they filled in the survey. Over half of them (55%) were simply motivated by the fact that “it looked interesting”. Around a third (35%) came because of specific artists or performers, and 16% came because the event had been recommended. Comparing these again with other research, Matthews Millman found that 47% of their orchestral attenders came because of the orchestra, and the Arts Council’s Arts in England survey of 6,000 adults in 2003 found that just 7% of respondents said they were motivated to attend the last arts event they went to because of a recommendation. (Arts In England Survey 2003 – survey of 6,025 adults from the Office of National Statistics Omnibus Survey 2003).
These comparisons imply that the contemporary attenders were less likely to be motivated by the particular performing group or artists, a higher proportion of them will come on recommendation, and they are more likely to come just because the event looks interesting – in other words they are more likely to take a risk.
2.5 Age Profile

Half the audience was made up of people between the ages of 45 and 64. Around a third were aged under 45, and just 16% were 65 or older. This is a much lower proportion of older people than the orchestral audience, which had 39% of people aged 65 or over for standard concerts and 47% aged 65 or over for Classic FM supported concerts (figures from Matthews Millman Classic FM research).
2.6 Mosaic Profile
Mosaic divides up the audience in terms of their socio-demographics, lifestyles and behaviour, using sources such as census data, the electoral role, house prices and lifestyle survey information. There were 2 significant groups amongst contemporary bookers which applied to all promoters’ audiences. The first of these groups is called “Urban Intelligence” and the Sound Circuit data had around 31% of bookers in this group, compared to just 7% of UK households overall.
- People in the Urban Intelligence group are young, well educated and open to new ideas and influences. They are cosmopolitan in their tastes and liberal in their social attitudes. Few have children. Many are in further education while others are moving into full-time employment.
The next most significant group across all promoters is called “Symbols of Success”, and this group had 21% of contemporary bookers as compared to 10% of UK households overall.
- Symbols of Success people are well set in their careers and their incomes have risen far into upper income tax ranges. Some work for large corporations in senior management positions; some hold respected roles in professional practices; others have built successful enterprises with their own commercial acumen. These are people with busy and complex family lives. Their children are now less time consuming, with more independent lifestyles.
After these groups the profiles tend to differ according to audiences in different locations. For example the group known as “Suburban Comfort” is a significant one for some promoters, notably in Birmingham, Huddersfield and Manchester, and the group known as “Ties of Community” is also particularly significant in Huddersfield.
2.7 Touchpoint Profile
Touchpoint is a segmentation system which places consumers into 19 different categories based on the likelihood of them using different channels to purchase products, and on motivations such as price and innovation that lead customers to prefer one brand or product over another.
The first dominant group for contemporary bookers in this system is called “Quality and Choice”, which represents 19% of Sound Circuit bookers compared to 11% of UK adults.
- Quality and Choice comprises consumers who are less interested in innovation than in personalisation. Often having a wide range of active leisure pursuits these better off individuals are a relatively light consumer of mass media. Though not fashion driven, Quality and Choice will actively seek out and endorse niche brands that are specifically tailored to its own particular interests or needs. Its access to the internet typically arises from the educational needs of its children.
The next significant category was “Multi-channel experimenters”, which represents 19% of Sound Circuit bookers, and 13% of UK adults.
- Multi-Channel Experimenters see advertising as informative and entertaining rather than intrusive, but prefer humour to hard sell. Not being strongly grounded in family or local community networks these consumers are generally thirsty for information. Other than for iconic lifestyle labels, performance and function are more important than brand and competitions.
Also of interest are “Electronic Elites” of which Sound Circuit had 10%, compared to just 4% of UK adults.
- Electronic Elites are the consumers who are the most happy to engage electronically. They have a thirst for information and are quick to learn and apply their knowledge of new technologies and communication channels. Work and leisure blur; they have a modern self-image and their ability to adapt, network and interact is central to their lifestyle.
As with the Mosaic profiles, there were different patterns depending on the individual promoters. There were similarities between the Touchpoint profiles for CMN, London Sinfonietta and Brighton, for whom the Multi-channel Experimenters were particularly significant.
3 Action Research Projects
The action research projects gave promoters the opportunity to test out audience development strategies and share their findings with the other promoters on the circuit.
3.1 Huddersfield Contemporary Music Festival
hcmf undertook 2 projects (2004 and 2005) concentrating on attracting 17-25 year olds as new attenders, and combining targeted research, marketing and promotional elements to learn about the age group as an audience sector.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
2.2 Oxford Contemporary Music
OCM’s first project in 2004 concentrated on strategies to broaden the student audience. It aimed to grow OCM’s network of students who flyer and poster the universities and related sites through peer recruitment and developing OCM’s own contacts, and learning about the motivations of the student market through focus group research.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
OCM’s 2005 project focussed on finding ways to attract new attenders through cross-over from attendance at other non-music contemporary arts events. It aimed to do this by researching ways in which OCM could reach attenders to non-music contemporary arts events, learning about the ways the target group find out about events and their motivations for attendance, and devising strategies for OCM to use this knowledge to communicate effectively with the target group.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
2.3 University of York Concert Series
York Concerts set out to identify people who attend, or view, other contemporary artforms and who may be categorised as being the ‘curious’ audience. It aimed to achieve this through collaborating with other contemporary arts organisations in York and developing cross-over from their attenders.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
2.4 Birmingham Contemporary Music Group
BCMG used the Sound Circuit box office research findings to identify potential geographic and geodemographic markets, and devised a campaign to develop new attendance from those markets and increase BCMG’s capacity for on-going audience development in those markets. The geographic target markets were the 20-45 minute drivetime area around Birmingham (and specifically arts attending hot spots in that area), and the area in central Birmingham very close to the CBSO Centre.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
2.5 Royal Northern College of Music
RNCM set out to develop new attenders by identifying target groups, and inviting them to an accessible and welcoming initial experience of a new music concert, and then encouraging them to make a return visit. The project used the ‘Test Drive’ audience development principle as its basis.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
2.6 London Sinfonietta
In 2004/05 London Sinfonietta carried out a project developing audiences from their successful Warp/electronica series of concerts. They aimed to develop this segment of their audience by recruiting a team of people who had been to one of these concerts as audience ambassadors (connectors), encourage further attendance from them and their contacts, and learn about attracting similar types of people through discussions with them, and their involvement in developing promotional material for 2 forthcoming events – Steve Reich/Michael Gordon and Luigi Nono.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
London Sinfonietta’s 2005/06 project was called “Open Ears”. It involved recruitment of people to a music discussion group run by London Sinfonietta in a similar way to a reading group. Amongst its aims were the desire to introduce participants to new types of music, develop a form where participants could openly explore music and build confidence through discussion their ideas, and increase attendance at London Sinfonietta concerts by a diverse section of society.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|
2.7 Brighton Dome and Corn Exchange
Brighton Dome undertook a project in 2004/05 aiming to develop a cross-fertilisation of audiences for experimental music with contemporary classical and improvised music events. The project focussed on the 19-35 year old market for experimental music and involved finding out more about this market segment through focus group research, and then encouraging the attendance of a sample group at contemporary music events through offering risk-free promotions.
Project Methodology |
Main Outputs / Outcomes |
|
|